Arch Pediatr Crit Care Search

CLOSE


Arch Pediatr Crit Care > Volume 2(2); 2024 > Article
Ha: The journey to home for children using home mechanical ventilation

Abstract

Home mechanical ventilation (HMV) has transformed care for children with chronic respiratory failure, enabling early discharge and improving their quality of life. This review addresses key considerations for HMV, including patient selection, tailored ventilatory strategies, and caregiver education. Although HMV offers significant benefits, challenges such as equipment risks and caregiver burden underscore the need for proper training and support. These comprehensive considerations and a multidisciplinary approach will help ensure that patients can be discharged earlier and return to their families more safely.

INTRODUCTION

Advancements in pediatric critical care have substantially improved survival rates for children with severe and chronic illnesses. However, this has resulted in a growing population of children requiring prolonged mechanical ventilation due to conditions such as neuromuscular disorders, congenital central hypoventilation syndrome (CCHS), and chronic lung diseases. For many of these children, weaning from invasive mechanical ventilation is prolonged or unattainable, leading to hospital dependency, which affects their development and places significant burdens on families and healthcare systems [1-3]. Home mechanical ventilation (HMV) has emerged as a solution, enabling earlier hospital discharge and improving the quality of life for children and families. By reducing hospital-acquired infections and promoting psychosocial development, HMV allows children to grow within a family-centered environment while easing the strain on healthcare resources. Advances in portable ventilators have further expanded the feasibility of transitioning children with chronic respiratory failure to home care [4,5]. The need for HMV is particularly significant in conditions such as spinal muscular atrophy, severe bronchopulmonary dysplasia (BPD), and traumatic brain injuries, where prolonged intensive care unit (ICU) stays can result in ventilator-associated complications, delayed development, and family stress. HMV reduces the frequency of hospitalizations, facilitates earlier discharge, and empowers families to actively participate in care [2,6].
Although HMV offers profound clinical and societal benefits, including cost reduction and integration into daily life, it requires meticulous planning and support. Poor transitions or insufficient training can lead to complications such as hospital readmissions, caregiver fatigue, and equipment-related issues. Addressing these challenges is essential for optimizing outcomes and sustaining HMV [7-10]. This review focuses on the key considerations for applying HMV in pediatric patients facing prolonged weaning from mechanical ventilation. It explores the indications, methods, considerations, and challenges to provide a framework for early discharge from the ICU, aiming to make HMV not just a medical intervention, but a means of fostering independence and hope for these children.

INDICATIONS AND SPECIAL CONSIDERATIONS FOR HMV IN PEDIATRIC PATIENTS

Indications for HMV

HMV is an essential intervention for pediatric patients with chronic respiratory failure resulting from a range of underlying conditions. By providing long-term ventilatory support, HMV helps maintain gas exchange, reduces the need for extended hospital stays, and improves overall quality of life for both children and their families [2,3,11]. Neuromuscular disorders, such as Duchenne muscular dystrophy (DMD), spinal muscular atrophy, and congenital myopathies, are some of the most common indications for HMV. These conditions result in progressive respiratory muscle weakness, causing hypoventilation, recurrent infections, and eventual respiratory failure. HMV prevents nocturnal hypoventilation, delays daytime hypercapnia, and reduces the risk of acute respiratory failure in these patients, allowing for improved survival and quality of life [12,13]. Chronic pulmonary conditions, including severe BPD, cystic fibrosis, and advanced interstitial lung disease, also warrant the use of HMV. In patients with BPD, HMV supports lung growth and development, reduces work of breathing, and decreases oxygen dependency. Similarly, in patients with cystic fibrosis, HMV alleviates airway obstruction, reduces hypercapnia, and delays disease progression, improving both pulmonary function and life expectancy [6,12,14]. Central respiratory drive impairments, such as those seen in CCHS, traumatic brain injury, or post-encephalitic states, represent another major indication for HMV. These children rely on ventilatory support, particularly during sleep, to prevent life-threatening hypoventilation episodes. In addition, chest wall abnormalities, such as severe kyphoscoliosis or thoracic dystrophy, restrict lung expansion and reduce functional residual capacity, necessitating HMV to relieve hypoventilation and improve daily functioning.
Post-surgical recovery often requires temporary or long-term ventilatory support. Children recovering from procedures such as diaphragmatic repair, cardiac surgery, or spinal fusion benefit from HMV to stabilize respiratory mechanics and prevent complications during the recovery phase. These diverse indications highlight the critical role of HMV in managing a wide spectrum of pediatric respiratory conditions [6,10,12,14-16].

Special Considerations for Patient Selection

The safe, effective, and sustainable implementation of HMV in pediatric patients requires careful consideration of clinical stability, home environment readiness, caregiver capabilities, and ethical aspects of care.

Clinical stability

Before transitioning to HMV, patients must achieve clinical stability, including consistent ventilatory requirements, manageable secretions, and minimal exacerbations. Children with reversible conditions, such as BPD, are more likely to benefit from temporary HMV, while those with progressive neuromuscular diseases may require lifelong support. Hemodynamic stability and adequate nutritional status are also prerequisites for HMV initiation, as they influence the patient’s ability to tolerate long-term home care [1,2,7].

Home environment and equipment readiness

The home environment must be equipped to support ventilatory care, including a reliable power supply, adequate space for equipment, and appropriate emergency backup systems. Families must also have access to necessary medical supplies and technical support for equipment maintenance. Regular assessments of the home setup and caregiver capabilities are essential to ensure that the environment is conducive to safe and effective HMV [2,3,11].

Caregiver training and support

Caregivers play a central role in HMV management and must receive comprehensive training in ventilator operation, airway care, and emergency response. Training programs should emphasize practical skills, such as troubleshooting alarms and managing airway obstructions, while also addressing the emotional and physical demands of caregiving. Ongoing support through follow-up visits, telemedicine, and access to respite care can alleviate caregiver stress and prevent burnout, which are common challenges in long-term HMV management [14,17,18].

Psychosocial and ethical considerations

Families must be fully informed about the implications of HMV, including its benefits, risks, and long-term responsibilities. Ethical dilemmas often arise for patients with progressive or life-limiting conditions, since HMV may prolong life without necessarily improving quality of life. Shared decision-making between healthcare providers and families is essential to align treatment goals with the child’s best interests and family values. Clear communication about prognosis, potential complications, and realistic expectations helps families make informed decisions about initiating or continuing HMV [7,13]. If these indications and considerations are comprehensively addressed, HMV can be implemented as a safe and effective intervention that not only reduces hospital dependency but also improves the overall well-being of pediatric patients and their families.

SELECTION OF VENTILATION MODES AND INTERFACES IN PEDIATRIC HMV

The selection of appropriate ventilation modes and interfaces is a critical determinant in the successful implementation of HMV for pediatric patients. This process requires careful evaluation of the child’s underlying condition, respiratory mechanics, and individual needs to ensure effective respiratory support, optimal patient comfort, and long-term adherence. The decisions surrounding ventilation modes and interfaces have profound impacts on clinical outcomes and the overall quality of life for children and their families [12,17,19].

Ventilation Modes for HMV

The choice of ventilation mode in HMV must be tailored to the specific respiratory mechanics and functional limitations of the child. Pressure-controlled ventilation is widely used in pediatric HMV, particularly for children with neuromuscular disorders characterized by fluctuating lung compliance. By maintaining constant airway pressure during inspiration, pressure-controlled ventilation reduces the risk of ventilator-induced lung injury, making it a preferred mode for patients with weak respiratory muscles and variable lung mechanics.
Volume-controlled ventilation, in contrast, delivers a fixed tidal volume regardless of changes in lung compliance or resistance. This mode is especially advantageous for children with restrictive lung diseases, such as severe scoliosis or interstitial lung disease, where precise tidal volume delivery is essential for maintaining adequate ventilation. However, younger children may experience discomfort due to pressure fluctuations during breath delivery. This limitation can be addressed with hybrid modes or advanced ventilators equipped with adaptive algorithms to improve synchronization [14,19,20].
For children capable of partial respiratory effort, pressure support ventilation provides an effective means of augmenting spontaneous breaths. By delivering inspiratory pressure support, pressure support ventilation reduces the work of breathing and supports more natural breathing patterns. This mode is particularly beneficial for older children who retain some degree of respiratory drive but require assistance to achieve adequate tidal volumes. Similarly, spontaneous/timed modes, which combine spontaneous breathing support with timed backup breaths, are frequently employed in conditions such as CCHS, where intermittent respiratory effort requires support during periods of apnea. Advanced modes, such as volume-assured pressure support, combine the benefits of both pressure and volume control. Volume-assured pressure support guarantees a minimum tidal volume while dynamically adjusting pressure levels to improve patient-ventilator synchronization and comfort. This hybrid approach is particularly effective for patients with mixed respiratory pathologies, such as those with both restrictive and obstructive components [21]. For children with obstructive sleep apnea, continuous positive airway pressure is often used to maintain airway patency during sleep, preventing upper airway collapse and ensuring uninterrupted ventilation [2,14,17,19].
The selection of ventilator modes is undoubtedly important; however, the parameter settings within each mode can have an even greater impact on the patient’s respiratory status. For example, in infants with BPD, ventilator dys-synchrony can exacerbate hyperinflation and desaturation, while significantly increasing the work of breathing. Therefore, achieving optimal synchrony with the ventilator is critically important. For this reason, the precise adjustment of individual parameters, such as respiratory rate and sensitivity is essential. In the application of non-invasive ventilation (NIV), while other parameter settings are important, the adjustment of positive end-expiratory pressure is particularly critical, proper positive end-expiratory pressure settings are essential to overcome upper airway resistance and ensure effective airflow into the lungs. No consensus exists regarding the selection of ventilator type. However, the primary goal is to reduce the work of breathing and provide optimal respiratory support. Consequently, the decision is often based on the clinician’s expertise and preference.

Interfaces for HMV

The selection of an appropriate interface is equally important, as it serves as the critical connection between the ventilator and the patient. Interfaces are broadly categorized into non-invasive and invasive types, each with unique advantages and limitations that must be considered based on the child’s clinical condition and needs. Non-invasive interfaces, such as nasal masks, oronasal masks, and total face masks, are commonly used in children who do not require continuous airway access. Nasal masks are often preferred for their comfort and ease of use, particularly in younger children. However, their effectiveness can be compromised by air leaks if the child’s mouth remains open during use, necessitating additional measures such as chin straps or sealing modifications. Oronasal masks, which cover both the nose and mouth, offer more stable ventilation in children who are mouth breathers during sleep but may cause discomfort or pressure sores on the nasal bridge with prolonged use. Total face masks, which cover the entire face, are an alternative for children with nasal irritation or frequent skin breakdown, although their size and weight may limit tolerability, particularly in younger patients [12,22-24].
Invasive interfaces, such as tracheostomy tubes, are indicated for children requiring high levels of ventilatory support, continuous airway access, or assistance with secretion management due to severe bulbar dysfunction. Tracheostomy tubes provide reliable ventilation by minimizing air leaks, and the choice between cuffed and uncuffed tubes depends on the clinical scenario. Cuffed tubes are preferred in settings requiring high-pressure ventilation, while uncuffed tubes are often used in younger children to reduce the risk of tracheal damage [3,12,14,20,22].

Clinical Considerations for Mode and Interface Selection

The selection of ventilation modes and interfaces must be tailored to the child’s developmental stage, underlying condition, respiratory drive, and tolerance for invasive or non-invasive support. Regular reassessment is critical, as children’s needs evolve with growth and changes in their clinical condition. For example, children with progressive conditions such as DMD may require periodic adjustments to their ventilatory settings to accommodate declining respiratory capacity [2,3,19]. Advances in ventilator technology have significantly increased the adaptability and efficacy of HMV. Features such as leak compensation algorithms, adaptive pressure adjustments, and advanced monitoring capabilities enable better synchronization between the patient and the ventilator. Single-limb circuits with leak ports are commonly used in NIV for their simplicity and effectiveness in managing leaks. In contrast, double-limb circuits, which allow precise measurement of inspiratory and expiratory volumes, are preferred in invasive ventilation scenarios. By carefully selecting and regularly reassessing ventilation modes and interfaces, clinicians can optimize the delivery of HMV, ensuring effective respiratory support while minimizing complications and making patients more comfortable. This individualized approach is essential for achieving therapeutic goals and improving the quality of life for pediatric patients and their families [2,3,19,22].

FOLLOW-UP AND MONITORING OF HMV IN PEDIATRIC PATIENTS

The follow-up and monitoring of pediatric patients on HMV are critical components of care designed to ensure the safety, efficacy, and long-term success of therapy. This process involves a multidisciplinary team, including pediatric pulmonologists, respiratory therapists, caregivers, and, when necessary, other specialists such as nutritionists, physiotherapists, and psychologists. Regular evaluations of the child’s clinical status, ventilator performance, and family adaptation are essential to address evolving needs and prevent complications [11].

Clinical Monitoring

Clinical monitoring focuses on assessing respiratory function, growth, and development. Evaluations of gas exchange, including nocturnal oxygen saturation and CO₂ levels, are crucial for detecting hypoventilation, particularly during sleep. Polysomnography is recommended to optimize ventilator settings, especially for children with conditions such as CCHS or obstructive sleep apnea. These evaluations help prevent long-term complications and refine ventilator support [1,11,25,26]. Monitoring growth and development is equally important, as children on HMV often face challenges related to their underlying conditions, such as increased caloric demands or swallowing difficulties in neuromuscular disorders. Poor growth may signal inadequate nutritional intake or suboptimal ventilatory support. Anthropometric measurements and dietary assessments, along with consultations with nutritionists, ensure that children achieve developmental milestones [1,11,26].

Monitoring of Ventilator Parameters

Ensuring that the ventilator meets the patient’s evolving needs requires periodic reviews of its performance. Key parameters, such as tidal volume, respiratory rate, and pressure settings, must be regularly assessed. Advanced ventilators equipped with monitoring systems enable caregivers and clinicians to identify issues such as patient-ventilator asynchrony, excessive air leaks, or suboptimal pressure levels. Reviewing ventilator logs provides valuable insights into therapy adherence, particularly for older children who may resist wearing masks during sleep [11]. Routine maintenance of ventilatory equipment is vital to prevent device-related complications. Filters, circuits, and humidifiers should be replaced according to the manufacturer’s recommendations, and the functionality of ventilators should be tested regularly. For children dependent on invasive ventilation, tracheostomy care, including cleaning, suctioning, and monitoring for infections or obstructions, is essential for minimizing risks [7,10].

Assessment of Clinical Outcomes

The objectives of HMV extend beyond maintaining adequate gas exchange and include improving quality of life, reducing hospital admissions, and promoting integration into family and community life. Follow-up visits should assess the child’s overall health, frequency of respiratory infections, and hospitalization rates. Changes in symptoms or increased hospitalizations may signal the need for ventilatory adjustments or additional management of comorbidities like gastroesophageal reflux or airway infections. Psychosocial assessments are also critical, as the demands of caregiving can lead to emotional stress and financial strain. Periodic evaluations of caregiver well-being, along with access to mental health resources and support services, help sustain effective home-based care. Providing respite care and encouraging participation in peer support groups further alleviates the caregiver’s burden and promotes the family’s well-being [26].

Frequency of Follow-up

The frequency of follow-up visits depends on the patient’s stability and care complexity. Initially, frequent visits are required to assess ventilatory effectiveness, monitor the child’s adaptation, and address any challenges faced by caregivers. As the child’s condition stabilizes, follow-up intervals may be extended to every 3-6 months, with additional visits scheduled as needed for emerging health concerns [10,11,26].

Emergency Preparedness

Emergency preparedness is a vital component of HMV follow-up care. Families must have access to backup power supplies, spare ventilator circuits, and emergency contact numbers for their healthcare team. Caregivers should be trained to recognize early signs of respiratory distress, such as increased work of breathing, cyanosis, or altered mental status, and respond effectively to emergencies like ventilator failure or acute illness. Simulation-based training and emergency drills increase caregivers’ confidence and preparedness to manage crises [18,27].

WEANING FROM HMV

Weaning from HMV in pediatric patients is a highly individualized and gradual process that requires careful planning, continuous assessment, and a multidisciplinary team approach. Unlike acute ventilator weaning in intensive care units, weaning from long-term HMV involves systematically reducing ventilatory support while monitoring the child’s ability to maintain adequate respiratory function independently. The primary goal of weaning is to achieve independence from mechanical ventilation without compromising gas exchange, maintaining health, and ensuring quality of life [2,28].

Indications for Weaning

The decision to initiate weaning is guided by evidence of stabilization or improvement in the underlying condition requiring HMV. Children with reversible conditions, such as BPD or Guillain-Barré syndrome, are often suitable candidates for successful weaning as they recover or mature. Conversely, children with progressive diseases, such as DMD or advanced spinal muscular atrophy, may not be candidates for complete weaning due to the ongoing deterioration of respiratory function.
Indicators of readiness for weaning include stable oxygenation and carbon dioxide levels, reduced ventilatory dependence, improved respiratory muscle strength, and normalized nocturnal gas exchange as demonstrated by polysomnographic assessments. These indicators are crucial for identifying children who can safely tolerate reduced ventilatory support, particularly at night when the risk of hypoventilation is highest [2,28].

Weaning Strategies

Weaning from HMV follows a stepwise approach designed to allow the child’s respiratory system to adapt gradually. For children dependent on invasive ventilation via tracheostomy, the process often begins with daytime trials of spontaneous breathing using tracheostomy collars or T-pieces. During these trials, clinicians monitor respiratory rates, oxygenation, and carbon dioxide levels to assess tolerance. If successful, ventilatory parameters, such as inspiratory pressure or backup rates, are gradually reduced. Once daytime weaning is achieved, capping the tracheostomy or using speaking are options to further decrease ventilatory reliance while promoting upper airway functionality. For children receiving NIV, the process typically involves reducing pressure support or transitioning to less intensive modes, such as continuous positive airway pressure, before complete discontinuation. Nocturnal weaning is approached cautiously to minimize the risks of hypoventilation, with close monitoring and frequent reassessments. Outpatient-based weaning strategies supported by structured follow-up have proven effective in settings with robust healthcare infrastructure and caregiver education [28].

Monitoring during Weaning

Continuous monitoring during the weaning process is essential to ensure that the child maintains stable gas exchange and does not experience respiratory distress. Key parameters include oxygen saturation, carbon dioxide levels (end-tidal or transcutaneous), respiratory rate, and signs of increased work of breathing, such as accessory muscle use or retractions. Blood gas analyses provide additional confirmation of ventilatory adequacy, particularly during advanced stages of weaning. Polysomnography is a critical tool during nocturnal weaning, providing data on hypoventilation, apneas, and overall sleep quality. These evaluations allow clinicians to adjust ventilator settings and ensure the safety of reduced ventilatory support during sleep. Frequent monitoring and reassessments enable timely interventions to address potential setbacks and optimize the weaning process [3,28].

Barriers to Weaning

The weaning process may be hindered by physiological and psychological factors. Persistent medical challenges, such as chronic lung disease, airway abnormalities (e.g., tracheomalacia or subglottic stenosis), and insufficient respiratory muscle strength, can limit the ability to sustain independent breathing. Additionally, structural changes associated with prolonged tracheostomy dependence can complicate the process, requiring specialized interventions.
Psychological and behavioral barriers also play a significant role, particularly in older children who have relied on ventilatory support for extended periods. Such children may develop psychological dependence on the ventilator, associating it with comfort and security. Overcoming these barriers requires a multidisciplinary approach involving respiratory therapists, psychologists, and caregivers to build the child’s confidence and gradually transition them toward independence [12,13,28].

Success and Outcomes of Weaning

Successful weaning from HMV provides substantial benefits, including reduced dependence on medical equipment, increased mobility, and greater participation in daily and social activities, such as attending school and engaging in recreational pursuits. Families also benefit from a decreased caregiving burden and reduced financial strain associated with long-term ventilatory support. The success of weaning depends on several factors, including the underlying condition, the timing of the intervention, and the availability of a coordinated care plan. Children with reversible conditions are more likely to achieve complete independence from mechanical ventilation. In contrast, those with chronic or progressive diseases may achieve partial weaning, such as limiting ventilatory support to nocturnal use. Individualized care plans, frequent reassessments, and multidisciplinary collaboration are essential to optimizing outcomes for each child [2,3].
By carefully tailoring the weaning strategies to each child’s needs, providing continuous monitoring, and addressing both physiological and psychological barriers, weaning from HMV enables children to transition toward greater independence. This approach not only increases respiratory autonomy but also improves the overall quality of life for pediatric patients and their families.

POTENTIAL RISKS OF HMV

HMV has significantly improved the management of pediatric chronic respiratory failure, enabling earlier hospital discharge, reducing healthcare costs, and improving quality of life. However, it presents risks spanning medical, technical, psychological, and ethical domains. Addressing these risks is essential to ensure safety and successful implementation of HMV [1,2,4,7].

Medical Risks

Medical risks are primarily linked to complications from ventilatory equipment and underlying conditions. For tracheostomy-dependent children, risks include infections, airway obstructions, and tracheal stenosis, necessitating routine care and monitoring. Children using NIV face issues such as pressure sores, skin breakdown, and midface hypoplasia, particularly with poorly fitted masks. Inadequate humidification can lead to mucosal dryness and airway resistance, compromising ventilation efficiency. Recurrent respiratory infections and impaired respiratory drive in ventilator-dependent children further complicate care, underscoring the need for regular clinical evaluation [1,3,11,22].

Technical Risks

Equipment malfunction, such as sensor errors or power outages, poses a critical threat, potentially leading to hypoventilation or respiratory failure. Insufficient caregiver expertise in managing ventilatory systems exacerbates these risks. Regular maintenance, proper programming of ventilator settings, and caregiver training are essential to mitigate complications like atelectasis and pneumothorax [1,3,11,19].

Psychological and Social Risks

Children on HMV may experience social isolation, reduced participation in activities, and emotional distress, particularly adolescents coping with stigma. Caregivers face physical exhaustion, emotional stress, and financial strain due to their constant responsibilities, including equipment monitoring and emergency management. Comprehensive support systems, including counseling, respite care, and financial assistance, are critical to address these challenges and sustain caregiving efforts [5,13,26,29]..

Ethical and Legal Risks

Ethical dilemmas arise when the burden of care outweighs potential benefits, requiring decisions about initiating or withdrawing HMV. Legal risks include inadequate training, delayed emergency response, or equipment failure. Transparent communication, shared decision-making, and adherence to ethical principles help families make informed choices, while institutional safeguards minimize legal risks [1,7,13,14,30].

CAREGIVER BURDEN AND EDUCATION IN PEDIATRIC HOME MECHANICA VENTILATION

Managing pediatric patients on HMV places substantial responsibilities on caregivers, requiring them to oversee ventilatory support, manage equipment, and respond to medical emergencies. Although transitioning to home-based care improves quality of life for children and fosters family-centered care, it also imposes significant physical, emotional, and psychological burdens. Addressing the challenges faced by caregivers and providing comprehensive education are vital to ensuring successful HMV and sustaining caregivers’ well-being [2,18].

Caregiver Burden in HMV

Caregivers face round-the-clock responsibilities, including operating ventilatory equipment, tracheostomy care, suctioning, and monitoring for respiratory distress. The need for constant vigilance, especially with nocturnal ventilation, often disrupts sleep, leading to chronic fatigue and negatively affecting physical health. Emotional stress is compounded by anxiety over potential emergencies, social isolation, and financial strain from out-of-pocket expenses for equipment and caregiving support. These pressures frequently lead to caregiver burnout and can disrupt family dynamics, with siblings feeling neglected and caregivers struggling to balance multiple roles [14,17].

Importance of Caregiver Education

Comprehensive education programs are critical for reducing caregivers’ burden and improving HMV management. Training should begin during hospitalization and continue post-discharge, covering ventilator operation, alarm troubleshooting, tracheostomy care, airway clearance, and emergency protocols. Simulation-based training builds caregiver confidence by allowing them to practice responses to realistic scenarios. Teaching caregivers to recognize early signs of respiratory distress and maintain ventilatory equipment reduces hospitalizations and infection risks. Education should also include strategies for managing stress and avoiding burnout, with access to support groups and respite care reinforcing caregivers’ ability to sustain their roles [10,18].

Empowering Caregivers through Support and Resources

Ongoing support and access to resources are essential for maintaining HMV at home. Regular follow-ups with healthcare teams address caregiver concerns and reinforce training. Telemedicine provides remote consultations and troubleshooting, reducing the need for frequent hospital visits. Financial assistance programs alleviate economic burdens, while instructional materials, such as step-by-step guides and online modules, support caregivers in managing day-to-day challenges [14,18].

Outcomes of Effective Caregiver Education

Effective caregiver education improves clinical outcomes for children and reduces caregiver stress. Confident, well-trained caregivers are better equipped to prevent complications and respond to emergencies, reducing hospital readmissions and associated costs. Strong partnerships between caregivers and healthcare providers, characterized by open communication and ongoing support, empower families to deliver safe and effective care. This collaboration improves the quality of life for both children and their caregivers while ensuring the long-term sustainability of HMV in the home [10,13].

CONCLUSIONS

HMV has transformed the care of pediatric patients with chronic respiratory failure by extending survival, improving quality of life, and enabling family-centered care. Transitioning children from prolonged hospital stays to home-based care allows them to grow and thrive within their familial and social environments, marking a significant shift in pediatric healthcare. However, the success of HMV depends on a comprehensive approach that addresses medical, technical, and psychosocial aspects of care.
Despite its benefits, HMV poses challenges, including equipment-related risks, infections, and caregiver burden. Structured caregiver education in ventilator operation, emergency response, and troubleshooting empowers families to manage HMV effectively. Support systems offering respite care, counseling, and financial assistance reduce stress and increase the sustainability of home-based care. When feasible, weaning from HMV is a critical goal, dependent on the reversibility of the underlying condition and guided by gradual reductions in support. Multidisciplinary teams play a pivotal role in ensuring the safety and success of this process.
Ultimately, the implementation of HMV requires a patient-centered approach that balances life-prolonging care with quality of life and family well-being. Advances in technology and healthcare delivery will continue to improve the effectiveness and accessibility of HMV, enabling children with chronic respiratory failure to achieve their full potential while living at home with their families.
CONFLICT OF INTEREST
No potential conflict of interest relevant to this article was reported.
AUTHOR CONTRIBUTIONS
All the work was done by Eunju Ha.

REFERENCES

1. Sobotka SA, Dholakia A, Agrawal RK, Berry JG, Brenner M, Graham RJ, et al. Discharge practices for children with home mechanical ventilation across the United States: key-informant perspectives. Ann Am Thorac Soc 2020;17:1424-30.
crossref pmid pmc
2. Henningfeld JK, Maletta K, Ren B, Richards KL, Wegner C, D'Andrea LA. Liberation from home mechanical ventilation and decannulation in children. Pediatr Pulmonol 2016;51:838-49.
crossref pmid pdf
3. Amin RS, Fitton CM. Tracheostomy and home ventilation in children. Semin Neonatol 2003;8:127-35.
crossref pmid
4. Willis LD. The current state of home mechanical ventilation in children. Respir Care 2020;65:1936-8.
crossref pmid
5. D'Cruz RF, Hart N. A history of home mechanical ventilation: the past, present and future. Chron Respir Dis 2024;21:14799731241240776.
crossref pmid pmc
6. Preutthipan A. Home mechanical ventilation in children. Indian J Pediatr 2015;82:852-9.
crossref pmid pdf
7. Jeffreys J, Rahman M, Vears D, Massie J. Going home: clinician perspectives on decision-making in paediatric home mechanical ventilation. J Paediatr Child Health 2023;59:499-504.
crossref pmid pdf
8. Choi YH, Park JD. Home mechanical ventilation in children from intensive care unit to home: what is the major hurdle to overcome in Korea? J Korean Med Sci 2019;34:e292.
crossref pmid pmc pdf
9. Perez JM, Graham RJ. It's time to invest in children receiving home mechanical ventilation. Ann Am Thorac Soc 2024;21:1387-8.
crossref pmid pmc
10. Henningfeld J, Friedrich AB, Flanagan G, Griffith C, Hughes A, Molkentine L, et al. Transitioning children using home invasive mechanical ventilation from hospital to home: discharge criteria, disparities, and ethical considerations. Pediatr Pulmonol 2024;59:2113-30.
crossref pmid
11. Nayır Büyükşahin H, Yalcın E. The follow-up of children on home invasive mechanical ventilation after hospital discharge. Pediatr Pulmonol 2024;59:2145-8.
crossref pmid
12. Bayav S, Çobanoğlu N. Indications and practice of home invasive mechanical ventilation in children. Pediatr Pulmonol 2024;59:2210-5.
crossref pmid
13. Cobanoglu N, Yalcin E, Zampoli M. Multidisciplinary management of pediatric patients on home invasive mechanical ventilation. Pediatr Pulmonol 2024;59:2077-9.
crossref pmid
14. Rahman M, Jeffreys J, Massie J. A narrative review of the experience and decision-making for children on home mechanical ventilation. J Paediatr Child Health 2021;57:791-6.
crossref pmid
15. Amin R, Verma R, Bai YQ, Cohen E, Guttmann A, Gershon AS, et al. Incidence and mortality of children receiving home mechanical ventilation. Pediatrics 2023;151:e2022059898.
crossref pmid pdf
16. Racca F, Berta G, Sequi M, Bignamini E, Capello E, Cutrera R, et al. Long-term home ventilation of children in Italy: a national survey. Pediatr Pulmonol 2011;46:566-72.
crossref pmid pdf
17. Kwak S. Home mechanical ventilation in children with chronic respiratory failure: a narrative review. J Yeungnam Med Sci 2023;40:123-35.
crossref pmid pmc pdf
18. Zirek F, Çobanoğlu N. Caregiver education before hospital discharge for children on home-invasive mechanical ventilation. Pediatr Pulmonol 2024;59:2190-5.
crossref pmid
19. Park S, Suh ES. Home mechanical ventilation: back to basics. Acute Crit Care 2020;35:131-41.
crossref pmid pmc pdf
20. Borges EF, Borges-Júnior LH, Carvalho AJ, Ferreira HM, Hattori WT, de Oliveira Azevedo VM. Invasive home mechanical ventilation: 10-year experience of a pediatric home care service. Respir Care 2020;65:1800-4.
crossref pmid
21. Pavone M, Verrillo E, Onofri A, Caggiano S, Cutrera R. Ventilators and ventilatory modalities. Front Pediatr 2020;8:500.
crossref pmid pmc
22. Toussaint M, van Hove O, Leduc D, Ansay L, Deconinck N, Fauroux B, et al. Invasive versus non-invasive paediatric home mechanical ventilation: review of the international evolution over the past 24 years. Thorax 2024;79:581-8.
crossref pmid
23. Khirani S, Ducrot V. Mask interfaces and devices for home noninvasive ventilation in children. Pediatr Pulmonol 2024;59:1528-40.
crossref pmid
24. Castro-Codesal ML, Olmstead DL, MacLean JE. Mask interfaces for home non-invasive ventilation in infants and children. Paediatr Respir Rev 2019;32:66-72.
crossref pmid
25. MacLean JE, Fauroux B. Long-term non-invasive ventilation in children: transition from hospital to home. Paediatr Respir Rev 2023;47:3-10.
crossref pmid
26. Ozalp Akin E, Bingoler Pekcici B. Monitoring and supporting development in children on home invasive mechanical ventilation. Pediatr Pulmonol 2024;59:2224-7.
crossref pmid
27. Kalm B, Lai K, Darro N. Care of children with home mechanical ventilation in the healthcare continuum. Hosp Pract (1995) 2021;49(suppl 1):456-66.
crossref pmid
28. Kamalaporn H, Preutthipan A, Coates AL. Weaning strategies for children on home invasive mechanical ventilation. Pediatr Pulmonol 2024;59:2131-40.
crossref pmid
29. Genç A, Sonel Tur B. Rehabilitation in children with home invasive mechanical ventilation. Pediatr Pulmonol 2024;59:2203-9.
crossref pmid
30. Park M, Jang H, Sol IS, Kim SY, Kim YS, Kim YH, et al. Pediatric home mechanical ventilation in Korea: the present situation and future strategy. J Korean Med Sci 2019;34:e268.
crossref pmid pmc pdf


ABOUT
ARTICLE CATEGORY

Browse all articles >

BROWSE ARTICLES
EDITORIAL POLICIES
FOR CONTRIBUTORS
Editorial Office
Room 214, 14, Toegye-ro 49-gil, Jung-gu, Seoul 04559, Korea
Tel: +82-2-744-7888    E-mail: office@apccjournal.org                

Copyright © 2025 by Korean Society of Pediatric Critical Care Medicine.

Developed in M2PI

Close layer
prev next